you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (6 children)

Well, they clearly have too much money and have lost the thread. I can't imagine why I would watch such a thing.

I'm going to bet it's to provide training data more than anything.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    You should not train on AI generated content.

    Also, I expect older generations to fall for this.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] [S] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Well, they clearly have too much money

    They may have a lot of money, but they definitely don't have anything close to a reasonable return on investment. I believe the total revenues from "AI services" are sub $50 billion per year compared to at least x20 times capex and likely a very high amount of opex (hundreds of billion) per year.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    Agreed. I would imagine they are looking for new revenue streams because it feels like just running an LLM costs more than the derived value. Right now investors are pouring money into AI by the swimming pool full in the belief that a renaissance is right around the corner. But the view from the ground is that the value is never going to return that investment without getting creative.

    And when companies get creative rather than rely on fundamentals that drive sustainable growth, it's generally a steep slope to enshittification.

  • source
  • parent