As tensions escalate between California and the Trump administration over immigration, another potential battlefront is emerging over taxes.

The spat began with reports that the Trump administration is considering cutting funding for California's university system, the largest higher education system in the nation with about 12% of all U.S. enrolled students.

In response, Gov. Gavin Newsom wrote Friday afternoon in a social media post that California provides about $80 billion more in taxes to the federal government than it receives in return.

"Maybe it's time to cut that off, @realDonaldTrump," Newsom said.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] 34 points 1 year ago (12 children)
  • [–] 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Just join Canada. If you are willing to consider you aren't the center of the world, you are welcome.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    They will just flatten it with carpet bombs.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    California is unlikely to give up their nukes.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    Educate me for a moment, are Nukes on a seperate grid by state?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (3 children)
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (2 children)

    I didn't either. I meant are they seperate state by state like that where a state could threaten to use or withhold nukes as you were implying?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    They are controlled normally by the Department of Energy.

    But sesession would be a weird event, and many things would change. Physical location is not one of them. And the physical location of the place where the most advanced nuclear weapons are designed and built is in California.

    Would the physicists and engineers at Lawrence Livermore just pack up and leave? Or would they continue rolling out B.83s or something in between.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    Even more weird possibilities: would the DoE forcibly relocate the physicists and engineers who do this work? Or would California step in and protect them? In any case I think the number of weapons that wind up under the control of the State of California would not be zero. The same goes for bombers, and missile systems, of which California has the most flexible examples.

    Sure, the production missile fleet is in Montana and N. Dakota, but those things are there to draw fire, not necessarily to be used. But Vandenberg and Edwards are in California. What happens to those?

  • source
  • parent