you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Indeed, they evolved in similar environments, meant to fulfill a specific role in said environment. Here's a quote from my friend Vuca that sums it up pretty good.

A taxonomic exclusionist might consider only members of genus Vulpes to truly be foxes, but such is not my own view, thus here is why I am inclusive of what I deem a "fox":

"Fox" is a pre-scientific appellation. Hence I think what is considered a "fox" ought to be based on appearance and behavior (lay pre-scientific traits) rather than genetic taxonomy. And here are what I would define as the traits of a "fox":

  1. a small-to-medium size wild canid
  2. with a long bushy tail
  3. that hunts small prey, in a solitary manner
  4. that does not live in packs

From: https://findafox.net/user/vuca

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments