you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] -9 points 1 year ago (16 children)
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    I’m well aware of the limitations of LLMs and I use them when it works.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [+] -4 points 1 year ago (4 children)
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Have you seriously applied them at all?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    Wow, you mean a random stranger on the internet isn't as good at something as you?? Say it ain't so!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [+] -3 points 1 year ago (5 children)
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

    "If you use LLMs you're dumb and bad." You're literally a toxic gamer telling someone to "git gud." Imagine calling someone stupid because they said they use a tool to help them solve a problem. Are people who use calculators brain-dead idiots then?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    Demonstrably bad at research and math, yes. So don't use them for that purpose. A lot of work is being put into this area though, so it might change in the future.

    Basic writing? That's such a broad task. As evaluated by what metric? One thing they're very good at is writing texts that sound like they're written by a human. If that's what you need, then they're great for the task. Especially so if you need a lot of it. I wouldn't say that the ability to write a thousand words per minute is a foundational skill for anyone.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Not to be a dick, but this reveals more about your own limitations than it does about the power of LLMs...

    It just means you suck at prompting, which is basically just talking and explaining what you need

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [+] 0 points 1 year ago (4 children)
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Two things can be true. They have limitations and are useful. Hammers have limitations too. It's not their fault if you always miss the nail

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] 0 points 1 year ago (3 children)
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    You went out of your way to tell someone that if they find llms used full it means they are stupid and not as good as you. But now that your argument doesn't hold any water you don't get to play the "you are expecting validation from me" card.

    You have a superiority complex. Get over it and stop trying to tell other people how to live their lives just because you can't use a hammer

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    If you are this bad at cominucating, no wonder you can't use LLMs.

    I've been told that things will make me stupid and are lack of skill my whole life, TV, videogames, computers, calculators, phones, social media yet everyone around me turned out just fine (I'm not using myself as a reference because that is a fallacy, you have to look at other people when talking about these things).

    You are just a grumpy asshole who thinks highly of himself, and are not willing to even give it a proper chance. The whole point is not that they are perfect, but they take advantage of the P=NP idea. It's way faster to check and fix code from an llm than it is to write it all (as long as it is a lot of code. you can't generate line by line)

    Go live under a rock, although I'm sure you will still make arguments about how your rock is better

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)