The European Commission aims to reform the EU's cookie consent rules that have cluttered websites with intrusive banners asking for permission to track user data[^4]. The initiative seeks to streamline data protection while maintaining privacy safeguards through centralized consent mechanisms[^4].

Cookie consent banners emerged from the ePrivacy Directive (Cookie Law) and GDPR requirements, which mandate websites obtain explicit user permission before collecting non-essential data through cookies[^17]. Current rules have led to widespread implementation of pop-up notices that interrupt user experience and often employ confusing interfaces.

The proposed changes reflect growing recognition that the existing approach has "messed up the internet" while failing to provide meaningful privacy protection[^4]. Rather than requiring individual consent on every website, the Commission is exploring solutions like centralized consent management to reduce banner fatigue while preserving user privacy rights.

[^4]: Ground News - Europe's cookie law messed up the internet. Brussels wants to fix it.

[^17]: Transcend - Cookie Consent Banner Best Practices: Optimizing Your Consent Management Experience

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 173 points 1 year ago* (11 children)

The law didn't mess up the internet, asshole business owners with their bullshit malicious compliance (and spineless devs enabling them) messed up the internet.

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 74 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Yep, there even was a standard that would have been sufficient, Do Not Track. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Do_Not_Track

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • Even worse, many data agencies will use the Do Not Track flag as an additional datapoint to add to your fingerprint.

    This shit should be mandated, with strict “the company has been burned to the ground and the ashes have been salted” levels of penalties for violating it.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 30 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    It wouldn't be hard to add a clause mandating that websites provide an easy-to-access "reject all" button that actually rejects all cookies.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] [S] 3 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Yes, because of this i skip it, blocking anyway all the crap and cookies I don't want, as also these cookie advices, only it is annoying because it last some seconds before these got skipped by the filterlist.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment