222
Who pays for roads? Most US States require residents to subsidize cars (cdn.bsky.app)
submitted 1 year ago by to c/fuckcars@lemmy.world
53 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Only 3 states Delaware, Montana, and New Jersey raise enough revenue from cars to fully cover their highway spending.

The remaining 47 states and the District of Columbia must make up the difference with tax revenues from other sources

By diverting general funds to roadway spending, the burden of paying for the roads falls on all taxpayers, including people who drive very little or may not drive at all.

Source: https://taxfoundation.org/data/all/state/state-road-taxes-funding/

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 5 points 1 year ago (6 children)

I think this goes both ways though. Obviously cars get more money, but there are lots of instances of taxpayers paying for public transit they cannot personally use.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
    •
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    the thing about public transport is that you benefit from other people using it, i for one quite like having less traffic on the roads and less pollution in the air that i breathe

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    True! And while roads often have negative impacts, the positive economic impacts are measurable and legit (at least in absence of other ways of getting around!).

    To be clear, I am on your side lol, just playing devil's advocate

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    but there are lots of instances of taxpayers paying for public transit they cannot personally use.

    Yes, but public transportation has a return on investment that makes it worth paying for, even if you don't use it.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    the ROI of public transport is difficult to quantify though… things like social mobility, etc… we shouldn’t be thinking about public transport in terms of ROI - its quality of life improvement for the entire city

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    its quality of life improvement for the entire city

    That's exactly the point! You put in a dollar of tax dollars to get many dollars back in benefits (QOL, environmental, safer streets, lower healthcare costs, etc.).

    The same can be said for cycling and other active transportation investments, they pay back society in benefits. The data (and here) is incredible.

    Car-centric infrastructure does the opposite, and you are always losing money.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent