you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 7 points 1 year ago* (12 children)

I'm trans and wish you wouldn't project your not caring onto the rest of us. It only serves to show that you probably haven't experienced anything even remotely close to concentration camps or the related dangers. I did not happily do it with a smile on my face, but I voted for Kamala because I knew that this exact thing would happen if Trump were elected. It was incredibly obvious. Gaza is even more fucked, even more bombed, gestapo is roaming the streets, and we're actively discussing our community potentially getting sent to concentration camps.

But you decided to not even try to prevent it. You decided that because Kamala wouldn't completely stop the genocide in Gaza, that Gaza, immigrants, trans people, and minorities should all suffer even more.

I'm not sure how you still feel good about your protest vote (being in a blue state doesn't excuse it, either. You do not vote in a vacuum, especially when you talk about it online). If we ever get to vote again, I really hope you make better choices and don't get caught up on a single issue. You should be able to choose the lesser of two evils, because if Kamala were elected, we would be in a better position to make actual, valuable change for things like Gaza, trans rights, and progressive reform. Obviously, we can't know how much better of a position, but I can guarantee we would at least not be discussing how we're going to be sent to the camps.

I get that our community is hurting. Please don't make it worse for us because you're apathetic.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I completely agree on the idea of voting for Harris for harm reduction. But I'm genuinely curious why you think her being elected would put us in a better position to get progressive reform. She showed that she was completely unwilling to back down or change her stance to get elected. Once she had won the election, there really isn't any reason for her to change her stance. Even the idea that she would try to gain popularity to be reelected seems unlikely. Because if we have already proven that we'll vote for someone not because they have good policies, but because they have less bad policies. The next election would be the same. With her most likely running for reelection. And either Trump or some other far right extremist running against her, forcing a repeat of the hypothetical 2024 election where she won.

    It's a rather bleak cycle, that makes it frustrating when people constantly hammer against the voters for not holding their nose and voting for the lesser of two evil, rather than the Democratic party in general for not listening to what their constituents want, and changing to a more populist progressive policy. I don't agree with the protest voters, but I can at least empathize and understand where they're coming from.

    The really depressing thing is that even after losing because of it, we're still not seeing much of a shift within the party. This should have been a wake up call for them. But it seems they still haven't learned their lesson and seem more intent on using the Republican party as a cudgel to beat the population into voting for them, rather than actually adopting policies that make people want to vote for them.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago*

    Once she had won the election, there really isn't any reason for her to change her stance

    It would have been used itself as the reason not to listen to leftism since the headline (written by Ezra Klein) would have been "Neoliberalism Shows It Is The Only Winning Strategy For Democrats Again".

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] -1 points 1 year ago* (9 children)
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (8 children)

    It's okay to be appalled, it's normal. I'm appalled too. But because of our shitty, two party system, you are basically made to choose between the lesser of two evils in swing states. Choosing to not vote, or to vote for another party risks this exact outcome. While your vote in your state may not have had a direct impact (I'm willing to relent on that for now), what you say online (Lemmy or otherwise) or in person can convince someone in a swing state to also be apathetic, and that's what hurts. It only has to affect one other person in a swing state, and then they'll also spread their apathy to other voters in the state. It's not a huge logical leap to consider.

    When I say that you're apathetic, I'm only talking about your voting habits. I know nothing else about you or what you do. I'm also not sure how trying to show how this behavior could result in our current situation is "making it worse". I'm not trying to be insulting here, but if this apathy continues for the midterms (if they actually happen), it could very well convince some people to also not give a shit. I don't want others in states where it really does matter to see your comments and think it's all good to become entirely apathetic.

    What really got to me was your comment about not caring about getting sent to the camps. Your relatives experiencing pain and trauma is one thing, but to experience concentration camps yourself is another thing entirely. You saying you don't care about that could also be seen as you saying that you don't care about the rest of the community being sent there, as well.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [+] 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (6 children)
  • [–] -1 points 1 year ago* (5 children)

    People can be swayed by you without you ever knowing it, or even without them really even realizing it.

    We can't ever know if dems would've been much better because we lost that chance, but the GOP literally campaigns on being pro-genocide, so we knew where they stood on the issue beforehand. And we got even more confirmation of that now.

    Similarly, we knew that the GOP would do everything they could to villify and condemn trans people. At least the dems didn't fully campaign on it. Since you're in a blue state, I wonder if you have protections that trans people in red states do not? I sure do, in my blue state. The dems here didn't just talk about improving trans rights and protecting us, they actually did it, and have continued to do so. They did the same thing for abortion rights. Of course, not without massive complaints from the local GOP.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [+] 3 points 1 year ago (4 children)
  • [–] -2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    And republicans have run on decades+ of warmongering and genocide. Invading other countries directly.

    I know which one I prefer.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] 6 points 1 year ago* (2 children)