Neat breakdown with data + some code.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 3 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Actually, yes. Lifting the weight of a Toyota Camry 2 stories seems reasonable for a day's worth of energy storage for a house.

I'm not sure how expensive the lift and generator will be, but the weight itself can be anything that's sufficiently heavy.

You say chemical energy is way easier to store, but is it really easier and cheaper to store the energy needed for a home in a chemical battery?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    is it really easier and cheaper to store the energy needed for a home in a chemical battery?

    Yes. A 5kwh battery is about 50kg and smaller than a carry-on suitcase. String 6 of them together and you've got 30 kWh stored with no moving parts. Anker has that for about $15,000, maybe $30k installed.

    How much does a 3-story elevator cost? What about one that can capture the stored potential energy on the way down, and not break down?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago*

    And not just that, but safety and cheapness akd accessibility of the materials. Water is pretty cheap and common. If it spills, probably no big deal (flooding notwithstanding) unlike battery acid. Not as likely to explode (sometimes steam explodes stuff).

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Hmm… this might be easier to do with an electric car. Put it on an inclined track, and then drive uphill to store energy, and go downhill to release the energy.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments