29
Servarr wiki recommends no VPN? (piefed.social)
submitted 1 year ago by to c/piracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
12 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Yo ho me hearties,

I was reading through Servarr wiki's VPN Guide and saw this callout:

For most users, secure DNS is sufficient instead of VPNs and fixes indexer connectivity issues without the complexity and problems of VPN setups

Are VPNs no longer the recommended practice? I was under the impression a VPN was pretty much required for sharing stuff in a copyright-sensitive country. I'd be delighted if I could simplify my app stack.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Worse performance, not everything works, and depending on the country you live in and which VPN provider you pick a VPN can actually be a downgrade in privacy since a second commercial entity now has the ability to look at all your traffic and distil valuable data from it to sell. The better VPN providers say they don't do this (and some probably don't) but a lot of them will definitely do so.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    If the traffic is already encrypted, then it shouldn't matter that your VPN provider can see it.

    I agree about performance, but for my *arr stack it's not something I care about too much since I'm never actively waiting on a download to complete.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago

    If you only route your encrypted Usenet traffic through it then sure, the privacy argument is moot, you're just spending money for worse performance without any benefit.

    But way too many people route all their traffic through a VPN under the assumption that it improves privacy somehow, which often isn't the case.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent