WHERE'S TOM
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] 18 points 1 year ago (11 children)
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    They also skipped the whole "the entwives went feral and are all rooted near the shire" bit too, though that's fair since the hobbits never made the connection/told the ents about it.

    Would have been a good sub plot point to emphasize that tragedy though.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I thought the entwives went out east before they disappeared, right?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    I mean, sure, but how else can you explain the ominous forest near the shire that misleads at best, and outright attacks people at worse? Especially since the ents never find the wives while looking east, and described what happens when ents get depressed as losing rationality, the ability to walk, and increased aggression, etc etc.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (4 children)

    Sorry to be contrarian, but fuck "went feral." They just did their own thing. They had no obligation to live in Fangorn forest.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    I say going feral, as that forest is clearly hostile to anyone that enters, but the trees are rooted and don't visibly relocate, nor did they ever get described as being able to communicate (except, I guess, a clear GET THE FUCK OUTTA HERE)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Oh right – I don't think Tolkien gives any indication that the Old Forest near Buckland has anything to do with the entwives? It's insanely old, contemporary to Bombadil even, and the only named tree is characterized as male. I like the idea though.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Yeah, it never got revisited/explicitly mentioned, but between the description of the forest, and the way the ents describe what happens when they are alone for too long, its hard not to think the forest is full of entwives.

    The only named tree being male could be that a single male went with/found/was born among the entwives and also 'went feral', or it could be a mistranslation (in world or IRL) or the gender used got changed over time as people forgot it was a female tree (as it has been far too long since I read any Tolkien books to remember who voiced the trees name - if it was Bombadil this point is obviously moot)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment