Conservative talkshow host Erick Erickson tore into “moron” Attorney General Pam Bondi on Monday after she claimed “hate speech” did not count as “free speech” and would be targeted by her office.

“Someone needs to explain to Ms. Bondi that so-called ‘hate speech,’ repulsive though it may be, is protected by the First Amendment. She should know this,” weighed in Fox News chief political analyst Brit Hume

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child)

What? No, hate speech is not protected speech

Edit: I'm wrong. Hate speech is allowed, unless you're found to incite a riot. I was thinking of hate crimes, which are violent crimes with harsher sentences if they're found to be motivated by hate against some marginalized victim

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    Which is kind of bullshit because prosecutors cannot be trusted to tell the truth or ascertain as such. A crime is a crime and should be charged and not treated differently because the prosecutor has caused to impute motives that might never have been there.

    The fools that passed these laws new or should have known that people like Pam Bondi would be wielding them sooner or later. It did not take a lot of foresight to see how these laws would be abused but here we are.

  • source
  • parent