you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 136 points 1 year ago (14 children)

Given Reddit's past unreasonableness, I wouldn't be surprised if this otherwise reasonable explanation has an alternative motive.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 42 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    The motive is these mods hold a decent amount of power on the platform that they wish to reduce. They don’t want a repeat of the API protests.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 78 points 1 year ago (5 children)
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Gotta boost user numbers.

    Or obscure them considering not letting people see sub count only daily/weekly activities

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago

    That's it. It's the illusion of fairness and it takes away reddit jannies' ability to show off their powermod status, and that's the only incentive they have not to use sockpuppets for every sub they mod.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    This is actually another of Reddit's decisions that I'm in agreement with. Subscriber count isn't a very useful number, it largely just measures how old a subreddit is. You can already see how old the subreddit is much more accurately by looking at its founding date.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    The user numbers were bogus anyway since Reddit didn't automatically decrement the user number after banning a member. The banned member had to manually unjoin the subreddit. So the membership count was inflated with banned members.

  • source
  • parent