PC Gaming

pcgaming@lemmy.ca

15,879 readers

5,826 active

945 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

Be Respectful.
No Spam or Porn.
No Advertising.
No Memes.
No Tech Support.
No questions about buying/building computers.
No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 3 years ago

moderation log

moderators

EXiLExJD@lemmy.ca

UncleBadTouch@lemmy.ca

KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com

Major VAC [Valve's non-kernel anticheat] Live updates leaving cheaters crying (web.archive.org)

submitted 1 year ago by alessandro@lemmy.ca to c/pcgaming@lemmy.ca

25 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] fuzzzerd@programming.dev 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

That's a neat idea, and on the surface sounds good. I am wondering whether there are unseen issues with this type of setup.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 2 child comments

[–] DeathsEmbrace@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago* (1 child)

The guy you're commenting is not a hacker or he would know about cheat lobbys and servers. No excuses for cheaters in any way. If they really wanted they can go to cheat lobbys

Edit: Exactly what it says a server or lobby that let's you cheat specifically for cheaters to not get banned.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 1 child comment

[–] dankm@lemmy.ca 1 point 1 year ago

That's correct. I do do similar things professionally, but never with games. VAC always worried me.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent