▲ 199 ▼ New 'Thought Policing' Bill May Let Rubio Strip Passports from US Citizens Over Political Speech (www.commondreams.org) submitted 1 year ago by BrikoX@lemmy.zip to c/usa@midwest.social 29 comments fedilink hide all child comments Free speech advocates fear a new bill could let the Secretary of State strip passports from US citizens based on their speech. "Rubio has claimed the power to designate people terrorist supporters based solely on what they think and say," one said.
[–] FlowVoid@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (5 children) To repeat: This year Democrats filibustered an anti-trans bill, an anti-choice bill, and countless parts of the OBBB permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (4 children) At this point, I'd like a source for democrats filibustering an anti-trans bill and an anti-choice bill. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] FlowVoid@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (3 children) https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress/senate-democrats-block-bill-ban-transgender-athletes-womens-sports-rcna194623 https://www.nytimes.com/2025/01/22/us/politics/senate-abortion-vote-republicans.html permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (2 children) Thank you. I was wrong. democrats are occasionally willing to use the filibuster instead of just letting republicans use it to block things democrats ran on but never had any intention of passing. Now, how many times did republicans use the filibuster during biden's first 9 months in office? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] FlowVoid@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (1 child) I don't know, because filibusters are also an implicit threat. Plenty of bills from both parties never even come to vote because both sides know they will be filibustered. When the majority allows a successful filibuster vote like those above, it's because the majority wanted to put the minority "on the record", for example as pro-trans. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago When the majority allows a successful filibuster vote like those above, it’s because the majority wanted to put the minority “on the record”, for example as pro-trans. And how many times did that happen during the first 9 months of the biden administration? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (4 children) At this point, I'd like a source for democrats filibustering an anti-trans bill and an anti-choice bill. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] FlowVoid@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (3 children) https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress/senate-democrats-block-bill-ban-transgender-athletes-womens-sports-rcna194623 https://www.nytimes.com/2025/01/22/us/politics/senate-abortion-vote-republicans.html permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (2 children) Thank you. I was wrong. democrats are occasionally willing to use the filibuster instead of just letting republicans use it to block things democrats ran on but never had any intention of passing. Now, how many times did republicans use the filibuster during biden's first 9 months in office? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] FlowVoid@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (1 child) I don't know, because filibusters are also an implicit threat. Plenty of bills from both parties never even come to vote because both sides know they will be filibustered. When the majority allows a successful filibuster vote like those above, it's because the majority wanted to put the minority "on the record", for example as pro-trans. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago When the majority allows a successful filibuster vote like those above, it’s because the majority wanted to put the minority “on the record”, for example as pro-trans. And how many times did that happen during the first 9 months of the biden administration? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] FlowVoid@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (3 children) https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress/senate-democrats-block-bill-ban-transgender-athletes-womens-sports-rcna194623 https://www.nytimes.com/2025/01/22/us/politics/senate-abortion-vote-republicans.html permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (2 children) Thank you. I was wrong. democrats are occasionally willing to use the filibuster instead of just letting republicans use it to block things democrats ran on but never had any intention of passing. Now, how many times did republicans use the filibuster during biden's first 9 months in office? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] FlowVoid@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (1 child) I don't know, because filibusters are also an implicit threat. Plenty of bills from both parties never even come to vote because both sides know they will be filibustered. When the majority allows a successful filibuster vote like those above, it's because the majority wanted to put the minority "on the record", for example as pro-trans. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago When the majority allows a successful filibuster vote like those above, it’s because the majority wanted to put the minority “on the record”, for example as pro-trans. And how many times did that happen during the first 9 months of the biden administration? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (2 children) Thank you. I was wrong. democrats are occasionally willing to use the filibuster instead of just letting republicans use it to block things democrats ran on but never had any intention of passing. Now, how many times did republicans use the filibuster during biden's first 9 months in office? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] FlowVoid@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (1 child) I don't know, because filibusters are also an implicit threat. Plenty of bills from both parties never even come to vote because both sides know they will be filibustered. When the majority allows a successful filibuster vote like those above, it's because the majority wanted to put the minority "on the record", for example as pro-trans. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago When the majority allows a successful filibuster vote like those above, it’s because the majority wanted to put the minority “on the record”, for example as pro-trans. And how many times did that happen during the first 9 months of the biden administration? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] FlowVoid@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (1 child) I don't know, because filibusters are also an implicit threat. Plenty of bills from both parties never even come to vote because both sides know they will be filibustered. When the majority allows a successful filibuster vote like those above, it's because the majority wanted to put the minority "on the record", for example as pro-trans. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago When the majority allows a successful filibuster vote like those above, it’s because the majority wanted to put the minority “on the record”, for example as pro-trans. And how many times did that happen during the first 9 months of the biden administration? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago When the majority allows a successful filibuster vote like those above, it’s because the majority wanted to put the minority “on the record”, for example as pro-trans. And how many times did that happen during the first 9 months of the biden administration? permalink fedilink source parent