you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 1 year ago (2 children)

Genuine question, why? They reported on the information they had, even if it wasn't flattering to the left. Then they retracted it when the information changed.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 1 year ago

    My neighbor Steve says he knew Robinson personally, even went to the same church, and it was a brain parasite that caused him to go crazy and shoot someone.

    I'm just gonna print that in the New England Journal of Medicine, because after all, it's the information I have, and I can always retract it later, right?

    /s 🙄

    Misinformation is deeply dangerous and respectable journalists have a duty not to print bullshit in the first place. Sure, mistakes happen, but we don't just hand-wave it away with "well, they said sorry sooooo 🤷‍♀️".

  • source
  • parent