you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 5 points 1 year ago (7 children)

I think one solution is (browseable) Snapshots

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    Honestly, after re-reading my own comment, I'm considering just putting some stupid-simple wrapper around mv that moves files to a dedicated trash bin. I'll just delete the trash bin every now and then...

    -Proceeds to collect 300 GB of build files and scrapped virtual environments over the coming month-

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago* (4 children)

    There are solutions already. Just use them instead of rm

    https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Trash_management

    Then can alias rm to echo Use trash instead! or something. You wanna build new habits, not co-opt rm, it could happen easily that you're ssh'd into a system where your rm alias doesn't exist or similar

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    This breaks the advice to never alias a standard command to do something radically different from its regular function.

    Sure, go ahead and alias ls to have extra options like --color, but don't alias rm to do nothing, or even rm -i (-i is interactive and prompts for each file).

    Why? Because one day you'll be logged into a different system that doesn't have your cushioning alias and whoops, bye-bye files.

    Now that you think about it, you thought that ls output looked weird, but that didn't actually break anything.

    As you suggest, yes, look into your OS's trash option, but leave rm alone.

    GNOME-derived systems can use gio trash fileglob (or gvfs-trash on older systems) to put things in the actual desktop trash receptacle.

    KDE's syntax sucks, but it's kioclientX move fileglob trash:/ where X may or may not be present and is a version number of some kind.

    You could set up a shell function or script that fixes that syntax and give it any name you like - as long as it doesn't collide with a standard one. On that rare foreign system it won't exist and everything will be fine.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    You alias rm to do nothing. There is no danger of aliasing rm to echo. The only thing that'll happen is nothing.

    Or are you seriously suggesting that if you do this, you somehow get used to rm doing nothing? Like you'll just start rm'ing randomly because you know it'll echo? I mean, stupider things have happened, but... yeah

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago*

    My "trick" with this is to mv files I'm very sure I want to be "deleting" into /tmp . If it instantly turns out to be a mistake, I can pull it back. Else, it gets purged on reboot.

    This is usually A-okay for my home server since it reboots so rarely! A desktop machine might give you a little less time to reconsider. But it at least solved the "trash is using 45% of my hard disk now" issue haha.

    In the very worst case scenario there's the "Drop everything and run photorec / testdisk" as a last resort!

  • source
  • parent