you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 43 points 1 year ago (7 children)

The article says it could result in a fine that’s based on the value of the damage. You’d think having a famous artist’s work would increase the value of the building.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 28 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    would be funny if courts did agree it was net increase to value if they didnt destroy it

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago

    Interesting. "The value of the damage." I'd say it's pretty likely the Banksy worked increased the value of the wall, if not the whole property. So is that negative damage? The people who decreased the value where those who tried to clean off the artwork.

  • source
  • parent