99
The White House is Using AI to create Trump's Charlie Kirk speech. His pinky disappears at 0:18 seconds! (www.youtube.com)
submitted 1 year ago by to c/lemmytoday@lemmy.today
57 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

At 18 seconds into this speech Trumps Pinky disappears under his hand and his ring finger 'becomes' his pinky. This is clearly AI.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [S] -2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Occam’s razor

So in your opinion, the simplest explanation is that they went out of their way to try and disguise a cut for -some reason- rather than they just used deepfake tech? Ok, well that's fine that is your opinion, but to jump from "I came to a different conclusion than you" to "OMG OP is a Sensationalist pushing an Agenda and they are literally DESTROYING LEMMY!" is quite the stretch my guy. You seem to have a more sensationalist take than me from my pov.

Not to mention the mindless upvotes, because “Trump” + “AI” = upvote.

Why are you so hung up on upvotes? Can you buy anything with them? Maybe people aren't 'mindlessly' up-voting things- maybe they see the same things I do. You ever think of that? It seems like you just think everything that doesn't agree with you is wrong and bad.

If you have some proof of what you are saying I am perfectly open to hearing it and I will edit my post- until then its just so much wind.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I’ve outlined everything in the other thread. You’re not going to change your mind, I’ve had hundreds of conversations with people like you before. You can’t be convinced or admit you’re wrong. But maybe (I hoped) you could be persuaded to change your post title.

    The upvotes are what people see. It give this exposure and spreads wrong information. Factually proven wrong information. If you want a discussion that’s fine. That’s what Lemmy is for. What you’re doing is disingenuous by posting a post title with 100% certainty and a link to an ABC video making it sound like a news organisation said this.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] [S] -2 points 1 year ago*

    You’re not going to change your mind, I’ve had hundreds of conversations with people like you before. You can’t be convinced or admit you’re wrong. But maybe (I hoped) you could be persuaded to change your post title.

    I definitely could be persuaded to change my mind- but I'm certainly not going to do it just because some rando with an agenda who claims to be an expert and tells me that it's so with no proof.

    Factually proven wrong information.

    You haven't factually proven anything, and that is a fact.

    a link to an ABC video making it sound like a news organisation said this.

    What kind of moron would conclude that because of my post title, the video which has a completely different title and makes no such claim agrees with me? That makes zero sense.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent