This post uses a gift link with a view count limit. When it runs out, there is an archived copy of the article

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 3 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Anyone else annoyed these stories don't link to the book?

I wonder about the redactions: seems mostly women's names & faces yet not men's. Ghislaine Maxwell shows women are capable of the wrongdoing in question.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] [S] 1 point 1 year ago (3 children)

    The girls involved are victims, so I'm not surprised to see this decision about what to redact.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    That's an assumption: how do you determine that? Wasn't Ghislaine Maxwell a victim?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    I expect that the people doing the redacting have a very good idea of who was a perpetrator and who was a victim

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    I expect

    Another word for assume. Aren't they disclosing these files, because they don't know & the public demands scrutiny? Unless they disclose their methods, skepticism is warranted.

  • source
  • parent