you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 33 points 1 year ago (30 children)

What really hit me that all this superfood shit was nonsense was when I watched a real nutritionist answer a question about "the best superfood" and they said "potatoes."

  • source
  • hideshow 30 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago (10 children)

    It's true, potatoes are one of the few singular plants that can provide almost all of a person's nutritional needs with barely any other supplement.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 1 year ago* (8 children)

    More protein per acre than soy.

    A factoid brought to you by the National Potato Council, who told me this once and I've never bothered to fact check it.

    Edit: It's a lie! What other lies have lobbing groups told me???

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    I am going to consider this a success story, given that you were transparent about the provenance of this factoid, and you corrected yourself. Yay for learning!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    In fact it’s the most factoid it could be, an outright falsehood shared as a fact.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Yes, I did delight in getting to accurately use the word "factoid"; it's useful for working through the trauma of learning that "factoid" doesn't just mean a neat tidbit of fun facts, but rather quite the opposite. And for a "learning is fun" kind of gal like me, misinformation masked as genuine learning is deeply unfun — that is, unless we make the factoid itself our new object of study.

    The system works!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    iirc its more calories/acre than... well lliterally anything else. Not sure about any specific nutrient though.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    Corn beats it out, and by some reckonings so does rice. Pumpkins too.

    There are a few more exotic plants like tigernut and duckweed that are supposed to be really high, but not many people eat those as a staple crop. Palm oil and sugar cane are supposed to be super high too, though you probably don't want to be eating huge quantities of straight oil and sugar.

    Finally there are a few tropical trees like jackfruit and breadfruit that produce enormous quantities of calories once mature. They have a huge advantage from their large leaf crowns and root systems (that they don't have to periodically regrow like annual plants) + the tropical weather allowing production for the entire year.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    Yes, but no. Yes it's a "super food" in the sense that they are easy to grow and are nutritious and contain almost everything the body needs, but you'd have to eat like twenty kilos a day to survive on them solely.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Also, they can't fly and potato eyes do not emit lasers.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (10 children)

    Rather broccoli. Mulberry and flaxseed too. Who knew, our pre-agriculture ancestors ate the healtiest.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (9 children)

    pre-agriculture ancestors ate the healtiest.

    and lived to the ripe age of 42.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (8 children)

    But not because of their food.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    Most likely also because of their food. Diabetes, gluten intolerance, food allergies, vitamin deficiency from eating way too much of the one thing that grew and didn't die that harvest. Food related issues were all rampant, people just died of them.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] [S] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    But even more likely is child mortality bringing down the averages.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    You're not gonna believe why child mortality was so high.

    Also, the (often) improper diets of pregnant ladies, especially among the poorer classes of society, that meant a lack of essential vitamins and minerals, put mothers too at great risk. To compound the issue, matters got out of hand during the periods when the annual Nile floods did not materialize. With the mother dead, the newborn faced an uphill task in surviving the odds. Feeding a motherless child was one of the greatest difficulties that the ancient Egyptians encountered. The milk of livestock – cows and goats – was the only substitute to natural mother’s milk. How many could afford it? This is where the aunts or other close family members of the baby stepped in to carry out this function and keep the baby well-fed.

    It was also the food.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

    Uhm, i'm talking pre-agriculture. Hunter-gatherer style, lots of seeds, some roots and vegetables, berries fruits, sometimes meat or fish.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments