▲ 183 ▼ Sextortion with a twist: Spyware takes webcam pics of users watching porn (arstechnica.com) submitted 1 year ago by return2ozma@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world 55 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[+] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 2 points 1 year ago (8 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] rapchee@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (7 children) i haven't used it, only read some available documentation, but it seems like a subscription service to access a server with stuff of dubious legality on it, but please correct me if i'm wrong. i kinda want to get into it but, as i was saying, i fail to see how it is better than torrenting permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [+] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (7 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] pmk@lemmy.sdf.org 8 points 1 year ago (1 child) Doesn't this also mean that the server can be a single point of failure? Whereas in a torrent swarm it's distributed and more resilient? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 2 points 1 year ago (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] pmk@lemmy.sdf.org 1 point 1 year ago I was thinking more about legal actions. But then again torrents need trackers and search sites. It seems like it's hard to shut down pirate bay though. I just have a feeling that usenet flies under the radar a bit, but if it became mainstream, it might be easier to shut down a server than a shifting swarm of peers? permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (-1 replies) [–] vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 1 year ago (4 children) It's also a fscking mess to set up a Usenet downloader, especially since it'd be a bunch of buggy weird stuff ending with -arr in the names and web UIs. And no, torrenting isn't outdated and isn't amateur. In Usenet messages are replicated over all services offering that newsgroup. I hope the downsides are clear. Some kind of Usenet with global identifiers of messages and posters, and with something like Kademlia to find sources for a specific newsgroup(to get all the other side has in it)/post(to get it specifically)/person(their public key), would be much better than just replicating each message everywhere with a local identifier. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 year ago* (1 child) Well you could use the -arr stack but you could also just set up SABnzbd which is the same difficulty to set up as qbit/jackett. I haven't touched the -arrs myself, just go to my indexer, click download, it goes into the correct folder which sabnzbd automatically picks up and starts a-downloadin', then it transfers the complete files to another folder. But I use both, and slsk, and ytdl. Why limit myself? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 year ago OK, I'll try it. permalink fedilink source parent [+] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 1 point 1 year ago (2 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) Centralization, need to have a big commercial provider which you can pay (as someone in Russia ...). permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org 1 point 1 year ago That puts limits on scaling it. Fediverse - honestly too centralized for my taste. permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (-1 replies) load more comments (-1 replies) load more comments (-1 replies)
[–] rapchee@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (7 children) i haven't used it, only read some available documentation, but it seems like a subscription service to access a server with stuff of dubious legality on it, but please correct me if i'm wrong. i kinda want to get into it but, as i was saying, i fail to see how it is better than torrenting permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [+] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (7 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] pmk@lemmy.sdf.org 8 points 1 year ago (1 child) Doesn't this also mean that the server can be a single point of failure? Whereas in a torrent swarm it's distributed and more resilient? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 2 points 1 year ago (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] pmk@lemmy.sdf.org 1 point 1 year ago I was thinking more about legal actions. But then again torrents need trackers and search sites. It seems like it's hard to shut down pirate bay though. I just have a feeling that usenet flies under the radar a bit, but if it became mainstream, it might be easier to shut down a server than a shifting swarm of peers? permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (-1 replies) [–] vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 1 year ago (4 children) It's also a fscking mess to set up a Usenet downloader, especially since it'd be a bunch of buggy weird stuff ending with -arr in the names and web UIs. And no, torrenting isn't outdated and isn't amateur. In Usenet messages are replicated over all services offering that newsgroup. I hope the downsides are clear. Some kind of Usenet with global identifiers of messages and posters, and with something like Kademlia to find sources for a specific newsgroup(to get all the other side has in it)/post(to get it specifically)/person(their public key), would be much better than just replicating each message everywhere with a local identifier. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 year ago* (1 child) Well you could use the -arr stack but you could also just set up SABnzbd which is the same difficulty to set up as qbit/jackett. I haven't touched the -arrs myself, just go to my indexer, click download, it goes into the correct folder which sabnzbd automatically picks up and starts a-downloadin', then it transfers the complete files to another folder. But I use both, and slsk, and ytdl. Why limit myself? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 year ago OK, I'll try it. permalink fedilink source parent [+] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 1 point 1 year ago (2 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) Centralization, need to have a big commercial provider which you can pay (as someone in Russia ...). permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org 1 point 1 year ago That puts limits on scaling it. Fediverse - honestly too centralized for my taste. permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (-1 replies) load more comments (-1 replies) load more comments (-1 replies)
[+] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (7 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] pmk@lemmy.sdf.org 8 points 1 year ago (1 child) Doesn't this also mean that the server can be a single point of failure? Whereas in a torrent swarm it's distributed and more resilient? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 2 points 1 year ago (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] pmk@lemmy.sdf.org 1 point 1 year ago I was thinking more about legal actions. But then again torrents need trackers and search sites. It seems like it's hard to shut down pirate bay though. I just have a feeling that usenet flies under the radar a bit, but if it became mainstream, it might be easier to shut down a server than a shifting swarm of peers? permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (-1 replies) [–] vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 1 year ago (4 children) It's also a fscking mess to set up a Usenet downloader, especially since it'd be a bunch of buggy weird stuff ending with -arr in the names and web UIs. And no, torrenting isn't outdated and isn't amateur. In Usenet messages are replicated over all services offering that newsgroup. I hope the downsides are clear. Some kind of Usenet with global identifiers of messages and posters, and with something like Kademlia to find sources for a specific newsgroup(to get all the other side has in it)/post(to get it specifically)/person(their public key), would be much better than just replicating each message everywhere with a local identifier. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 year ago* (1 child) Well you could use the -arr stack but you could also just set up SABnzbd which is the same difficulty to set up as qbit/jackett. I haven't touched the -arrs myself, just go to my indexer, click download, it goes into the correct folder which sabnzbd automatically picks up and starts a-downloadin', then it transfers the complete files to another folder. But I use both, and slsk, and ytdl. Why limit myself? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 year ago OK, I'll try it. permalink fedilink source parent [+] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 1 point 1 year ago (2 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) Centralization, need to have a big commercial provider which you can pay (as someone in Russia ...). permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org 1 point 1 year ago That puts limits on scaling it. Fediverse - honestly too centralized for my taste. permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (-1 replies) load more comments (-1 replies)
[–] pmk@lemmy.sdf.org 8 points 1 year ago (1 child) Doesn't this also mean that the server can be a single point of failure? Whereas in a torrent swarm it's distributed and more resilient? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 2 points 1 year ago (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] pmk@lemmy.sdf.org 1 point 1 year ago I was thinking more about legal actions. But then again torrents need trackers and search sites. It seems like it's hard to shut down pirate bay though. I just have a feeling that usenet flies under the radar a bit, but if it became mainstream, it might be easier to shut down a server than a shifting swarm of peers? permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (-1 replies)
[+] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 2 points 1 year ago (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] pmk@lemmy.sdf.org 1 point 1 year ago I was thinking more about legal actions. But then again torrents need trackers and search sites. It seems like it's hard to shut down pirate bay though. I just have a feeling that usenet flies under the radar a bit, but if it became mainstream, it might be easier to shut down a server than a shifting swarm of peers? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] pmk@lemmy.sdf.org 1 point 1 year ago I was thinking more about legal actions. But then again torrents need trackers and search sites. It seems like it's hard to shut down pirate bay though. I just have a feeling that usenet flies under the radar a bit, but if it became mainstream, it might be easier to shut down a server than a shifting swarm of peers? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 1 year ago (4 children) It's also a fscking mess to set up a Usenet downloader, especially since it'd be a bunch of buggy weird stuff ending with -arr in the names and web UIs. And no, torrenting isn't outdated and isn't amateur. In Usenet messages are replicated over all services offering that newsgroup. I hope the downsides are clear. Some kind of Usenet with global identifiers of messages and posters, and with something like Kademlia to find sources for a specific newsgroup(to get all the other side has in it)/post(to get it specifically)/person(their public key), would be much better than just replicating each message everywhere with a local identifier. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 year ago* (1 child) Well you could use the -arr stack but you could also just set up SABnzbd which is the same difficulty to set up as qbit/jackett. I haven't touched the -arrs myself, just go to my indexer, click download, it goes into the correct folder which sabnzbd automatically picks up and starts a-downloadin', then it transfers the complete files to another folder. But I use both, and slsk, and ytdl. Why limit myself? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 year ago OK, I'll try it. permalink fedilink source parent [+] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 1 point 1 year ago (2 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) Centralization, need to have a big commercial provider which you can pay (as someone in Russia ...). permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org 1 point 1 year ago That puts limits on scaling it. Fediverse - honestly too centralized for my taste. permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (-1 replies) load more comments (-1 replies)
[–] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 year ago* (1 child) Well you could use the -arr stack but you could also just set up SABnzbd which is the same difficulty to set up as qbit/jackett. I haven't touched the -arrs myself, just go to my indexer, click download, it goes into the correct folder which sabnzbd automatically picks up and starts a-downloadin', then it transfers the complete files to another folder. But I use both, and slsk, and ytdl. Why limit myself? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 year ago OK, I'll try it. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 1 point 1 year ago (2 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) Centralization, need to have a big commercial provider which you can pay (as someone in Russia ...). permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org 1 point 1 year ago That puts limits on scaling it. Fediverse - honestly too centralized for my taste. permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (-1 replies)
[–] vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) Centralization, need to have a big commercial provider which you can pay (as someone in Russia ...). permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org 1 point 1 year ago That puts limits on scaling it. Fediverse - honestly too centralized for my taste. permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (-1 replies)
[+] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org 1 point 1 year ago That puts limits on scaling it. Fediverse - honestly too centralized for my taste. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org 1 point 1 year ago That puts limits on scaling it. Fediverse - honestly too centralized for my taste. permalink fedilink source parent