you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 6 points 1 year ago (6 children)

I would be very impressed if he surgically removed his own legs. I mean, there is a lot of tissue and bone to cut through. That's not easy to do by yourself. But if that's the case, that's where the fraud aspect could come from.

Also, is that a thing? "Disability by choice" so you get a lower payout? But even if, wouldn't that be paid by some other insurance - like a specific disability insurance rather than your typical health insurance? At least in Germany the latter is very much different, health insurances only pay for treatments, recovery and prevention.

The lie about the cause of the injury must somehow be related to the payout, otherwise I can't believe how it would constitute fraud. Still, this is really confusing because private health insurances usually cannot decline/reduce claims due to intentional injury.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago* (4 children)

    Also, it looks like "old mutual health" was recently re-branded to "ReAssure" in the UK, so that would be who to look up for what type of insurance they would provide. It does sound like they were life insurance, or "life assurance" as they called it. Sounds very much like disability insurance would be under their umbrella.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (3 children)

    No, that's Old Mutual Wealth which rebranded. Wealth, not Health. Maybe this is a mistake in the article?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Oh, as far as I could tell they were part of the same company, the health was an umbrella with the wealth one under it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments