you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 22 points 1 year ago* (3 children)

This will probably be an unpopular opinion but I think the reality is that the choice whether to be a landlord has no effect on the supply of housing and so is almost totally irrelevant to this essentially systemic issue. The only kind of stuff that matters here:

  • Supply of housing influencing its cost
  • Relative wealth of the poorest influencing their ability to pay for housing
  • Other factors (the credit system etc) limiting people's access to housing
  • Legal ability to use housing as a speculative investment and store of wealth (ie. low property taxes even if you own multiple properties)

The idea that people would buy property and then provide housing on a charitable basis in defiance of the market isn't realistic and isn't a viable solution to the problem. The only solution is to build the right incentives into the system. Someone can support the latter without trying to do the former.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] -10 points 1 year ago (2 children)
  • [–] 17 points 1 year ago

    Well like I said that's kind of the sentiment I expect because people like to make this about individual morality, but care to elaborate at all? Do you disagree with any particular part of what I'm saying?

  • source
  • parent