cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/35308060

Misleading pricing:

Using the billing period as the header and showing the price for the billing period... except for monthly—which shows 1/4 the price and says "every week" in smaller, gray text.

Punishing non-subscription payments:

Adding a $6.50 (1400%) surcharge for wanting a weekly one-time payment instead of a recurring subscription.

Charging more for longer periods:

Monthly billing, once you remove the dark pattern and convert it to its actual price, is $2. There are 12 months in a year, meaning it would cost $24 to maintain that subscription for a year.

Why is the yearly subscription $29, then?


If you want to verify this for yourself, you're going to need to clear your cookies and reload an article a lot. They do A/B tests and show different subscription requied modals. This one was the worst.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 21 points 1 year ago (3 children)

What am I missing? It’s just some quick math:

  • $7 x 52 =$364.00/year
  • $0.50 x 52 =$26.00/year
  • $29/ year

The 50¢ is designed to look the cheapest and it actually is the cheapest.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    You're missing the part where you shouldn't have to do quick math in order to know the price difference in a comparison.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    So even if quick math is hard for you. Going with the cheapest looking option, is still the cheapest.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago*

    How about the part where.

    “To get your first year of the post” “For 50c a week” Which is the monthly plan..

    Cheapest be damned, what am i even (not) buying? Contractually obligated to keep paying for a full month/year or fined?

  • source
  • parent