you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 21 points 1 year ago (15 children)

I'll stop faster because I'm towing a trailer.

My idiot FIL, a chronic tailgater, the last ever time I opted to be a passenger.

  • source
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (10 children)

    If the trailer has very good brakes set to full power even when nearly empty, it's actually true, but I doubt that's the case…

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I actually asked him that at the time

    Oh, is it a braked trailer?

    No.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (5 children)

    I am pretty sure physics says "no":

    Ff <= µ*Fn

    • Fn is proportional to the mass of the trailer, so it is irrelevant for the deceleration (a) if it is empty or not (because Ff = m*a).
    • µ is a constant relying on the tire/ground connection. Comparable to the towing car (if you happen to have car tire quality ones on your trailer, which might be doubtful)
      .

    On top of that, typical car trailers use overrun brakes that per definition work by exerting an additional force on the towing vehicle in the direction of movement that is then used to activate the trailer brake.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Fair enough, car trailers do have garbage braking most of the time anyway. I may be biased because locomotives are so heavy and the traction you get with steel is shit so they actually benefit from some load behind…

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Locomotives? What is your profession?
    In any case, I seriously hope that you are not tailgaiting ;-)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    That is an oversimplified friction model that does not apply well to emergency braking. I still don't think you get a better braking distance with a trailer in a typical situation but thats not the reason why.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    I could see where, if the trailer has good brakes and a relatively light load, it could provide additional stopping power.

    That's usually not going to be the case though.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (2 children)

    I'm reasonably sure that you'll never stop sooner, you'll likely be exceeding the traction from the tires at that point anyway.

    The trailer wasn't braked.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    It is my understanding that there are two types of brakes you'll find on trailers, the ones activated by a weight that swings forward under the force of the truck's braking, and electric ones. Neither are anti-lock or anything fance, and neither are really designed to provide actual stopping power, the drag they add is meant to help maintain control. Most of the braking force is done by the truck's front wheels.

    I don't think it's impossible for there to be a spot on the performance envelope where you'll stop a few feet shorter with a lightly loaded trailer, but I bet it's not particularly large.

    It is impossible with a trailer with no brakes.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago*

    Hence the "stupidest thing" :-)

    There might be a way to load a trailer with perfectly spherical chickens and brake a certain way that maximized braking performance to... get a MythBusters result.

    I assure you, that argument is exclusive to this forum, and wasn't part of the dialog in the car at the time :-)

  • source
  • parent