you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Why is it bad? Like what should I use instead on my website for images and icons?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    webp is fine for web publishing.

    I have a problem with websites that use middleware that makes webp masquerade as jpg or png. so when you go to save it locally, it's a surprise webp.

    not only that, webp is a standard that google made and pushed into the web consortium. I explicitly hate anything Google forces on the Internet.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago*

    The lossless mode is great (but more limited than PNG), the lossy mode sucks though. Like it only supports a quarter of the colour resolution compared to formats like JPEG.

    Also being a video format, it's not actually tuned to store still images, it likes to blur/smear things.

    Edit: But if you're using it for the intended purpose, low resolution previews, thumbnails and stuff like branding, it's fine. I wouldn't use it where quality matters.

  • source
  • parent