you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 27 points 1 year ago (7 children)

Iran needs nukes to defend itself from a nuclear armed aggressor. Everyone needs nukes for that reason. Greenland needs nukes to protect itself from the US.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Probability of nuclear war rises with number of states having nukes. It's best to keep that number as low as possible, so I would not think it wise for Greenland to have nukes. It would not be a sin for Iran to have them, though, given Iran's allies aren't exactly offering a nuclear umbrella.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • best to keep the number low

    Yeah it would be cool if Ukraine was a positive example of what happens when you surrender your nuclear weapons.

    How about we all just agree to glass any religious fanatics, especially ethnostates, that get their hands on the things?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago*

    with extinction technology, i don't know what the answer is. i think you either need a high level of trust and cooperation between all wielding parties which never goes away, or you need a singular world government which has no reason to arm itself with such a thing.

    the stalemate situation where all enemies have a gun to point at one another so that nobody fires a shot is crazy. that can't be the solution.

  • source
  • parent