edit to clarify a misconception in the comments, this is an instagram post so “caption” refers to the description under the image or video

as an example, this text i am typing now is also a “caption”

just saying because someone started a debate misunderstanding this to be about subtitles (aka “closed captions”) and that’s just not the case 👍

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] 20 points 1 year ago (6 children)
  • [–] -4 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    I have to disagree with you. Ai is never a more accurate way to describe what we have now. Not until they call true ai something different.

    I know its a weird hill to die on, but die on it I will. Calling one artifical intelligence and one virtual intelligence could work.

    Also it's my understanding that LLMs are considered a type of neural net so I don't see it being more accurate to call it a neural net vs a llm.

    And they are all subsets of machine learning so calling it an ml model leads me back to the same issue I have with "ai". (And the same reason those loser usb fucks can suck a bag of dildos) lack of clairty of what it actually can do.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Then call it ML or a neural net. Using the term LLM like you are for other forms of machine learning is just going to cause needless confusion, like it has in this thread.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    No. "Machine learning" is the root of the tree.

    Or to steal another commenters attempts to have me call it that - that would be like calling a chihuahu a wolf.

    Machine learning -> neural net -> LLM. Thats the basic "path". I dont CARE if LLM is technically wrong when using machine learning or neural net is also inaccurate.

    If anything yall should be arguing for me to call it ASR 2.0

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)