you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] -6 points 1 year ago (10 children)

Good. An armed society is a polite society. Guns are the great equaliser. Larger and stronger people aren’t free to assault smaller and weaker people as they wish. There are societies like Singapore and China where crime is punished so severely that people don’t need personal protection. Sadly, today, that’s not how most of the West is run.

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    There is -- as far as I'm aware -- no good data to suggest any of this is true. The severity of punishment has no correlative link let alone causative link to crime rate. As for "politeness" I don't even know how to tackle this, I know Japan and Canada are considered "polite" by public opinion and both have stricter gun regulation than US. And as for the great equalizer claim while I can see that theoretically it could be an equalizer of force that would only be the case if the "weak" were as likely to have a gun as the "strong". If we simply compare women to men -- since women are often physically weaker than men -- we see the gun ownership rates skew heavily towards men. So if anything in that context not only is it not equalizing it is further dividing the gap between the weak and the strong in this context.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    Polite isn't the same as fear. Also both your catchphrases are right wing NRA bullshit propaganda which isn't remotely true.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    If the government won’t protect citizens they have the right to protect themselves.

    I’m not American and I don’t care how much you like or dislike the NRA. Your comment sounds like authoritarian bootlicking.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    When has the government failed to protect your or family members? Dont you think those would be the exception rather than the rule? If you are gearing up for the revolution I can't blame you but I doubt you need to protect yourself in that way unless its from animals or you are a drug dealer.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    When has the government failed to protect your or family members?

    Just so I’m clear, you think I’m not allowed to care about others? I’m not even allowed to care about my own safety until my family has been attacked? Wild take. I’m glad society isn’t comprised of people like you. I care about others as well as my family. Most people aren’t murdered and raped and assaulted each year. That doesn’t mean we shouldn’t care about murder and rape and assault.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment