you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 6 points 1 year ago (10 children)

Is someone forcing them to do that job?

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    no. They're army veterans who usually take good pride in it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago* (1 child)

    They are an active regiment in the British Army. You’re probably confusing them with the Beefeaters, who wear an entirely different uniform, and are mostly ex-service persons.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    Probably should have been more specific. Usually the guards are ones who have already been deployed and are coming to the end of their service. They are veterans, just not ex-servicemen.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] [S] 3 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    If it works like the recruiting works the same way in the US they where probably lied to/tricked.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    I believe the king's guard only recruits from enlisted veterans. They also have to have been deployed to an active warzone. In those terms, it's both quite relaxed and an important position. The pomp and ceremony that visitors see is only a small part of their job.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    That actually sounds like a much nicer option for veterans than the homelessness or underemployment they can experience in other countries.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    It's worth noting that their job has zero room for errors. They are expected to be basically invisible, outside of the ceremonial parts. They are also (I believe) authorised for live fire, at their own discretion.

    They walk a political tightrope, and the last major fuck up I heard about was decades back now.

  • source
  • parent