▲ 113 ▼ AI is creeping into the Linux kernel - and official policy is needed ASAP (www.zdnet.com) submitted 1 year ago by throws_lemy@lemmy.nz to c/linux@programming.dev 26 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] Senal@programming.dev 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children) No. You ? edit: If any of my answers made it seem like i was, let me know and i'll adjust them, that was not my intention. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net -3 points 1 year ago (1 child) No. Let's wait for someone who knows what they are talking about. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Senal@programming.dev 1 point 1 year ago You mean like a software developer who has to deal with PR's from sources that may or may not include LLM generated code ? If that's the case, i might know someone....... Wait... unless your original assertion was very specifically about only linux kernel development and not about the principles that apply to software PR review and LLM's as a whole ? In that case, i don't have anyone to hand and you should probably mark it "Active Linux Kernel Contributors Only". It's clearer that way. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net -3 points 1 year ago (1 child) No. Let's wait for someone who knows what they are talking about. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Senal@programming.dev 1 point 1 year ago You mean like a software developer who has to deal with PR's from sources that may or may not include LLM generated code ? If that's the case, i might know someone....... Wait... unless your original assertion was very specifically about only linux kernel development and not about the principles that apply to software PR review and LLM's as a whole ? In that case, i don't have anyone to hand and you should probably mark it "Active Linux Kernel Contributors Only". It's clearer that way. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Senal@programming.dev 1 point 1 year ago You mean like a software developer who has to deal with PR's from sources that may or may not include LLM generated code ? If that's the case, i might know someone....... Wait... unless your original assertion was very specifically about only linux kernel development and not about the principles that apply to software PR review and LLM's as a whole ? In that case, i don't have anyone to hand and you should probably mark it "Active Linux Kernel Contributors Only". It's clearer that way. permalink fedilink source parent