▲ 53 ▼ Major password managers can leak logins in clickjacking attacks (www.bleepingcomputer.com) submitted 1 year ago by leo@lemmy.linuxuserspace.show to c/news@lemmy.linuxuserspace.show 23 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] grue@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (4 children) Once again Keepass proves to be the superior solution. permalink fedilink source hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] pdxfed@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago Just like Craigslist; every ounce of energy out into veneer is energy not in the core product design and maintenance and also adds cost. Minimal, functional, excellent. permalink fedilink source parent [–] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago* (2 children) That's not at all what the article says. They tested 11 popular password managers, Keepass wasn't one of them. So if it wasn't even tested for attacks that nearly every other manager fails at least 1 aspect of, then you should assume it's not safe either. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] grue@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 child) then you should assume it’s not safe either. Well, except that the method of exploit was involving the web browser plugin, which isn't a thing Keepass does to begin with. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] arcterus@piefed.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 year ago There is an extension, but it's significantly simpler than the other providers. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] pdxfed@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago Just like Craigslist; every ounce of energy out into veneer is energy not in the core product design and maintenance and also adds cost. Minimal, functional, excellent. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago* (2 children) That's not at all what the article says. They tested 11 popular password managers, Keepass wasn't one of them. So if it wasn't even tested for attacks that nearly every other manager fails at least 1 aspect of, then you should assume it's not safe either. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] grue@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 child) then you should assume it’s not safe either. Well, except that the method of exploit was involving the web browser plugin, which isn't a thing Keepass does to begin with. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] arcterus@piefed.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 year ago There is an extension, but it's significantly simpler than the other providers. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] grue@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 child) then you should assume it’s not safe either. Well, except that the method of exploit was involving the web browser plugin, which isn't a thing Keepass does to begin with. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] arcterus@piefed.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 year ago There is an extension, but it's significantly simpler than the other providers. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] arcterus@piefed.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 year ago There is an extension, but it's significantly simpler than the other providers. permalink fedilink source parent