[–] [S] 4 points 2 months ago

I don't know your age, but this brings back some very strong DOS and Windows 3.1 memories for me. I loved that operating system. I'm glad that I use a Linux distribution and Firefox now, but I will always have nostalgia for that era and what I could make with MSPaint.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 6 points 2 months ago*

    Most AI systems work by reading the pixels of an image up close.

    Most work by reading Unicode code points, which are a superset of ASCII, because they mostly encounter digital text.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    Man, I adore the font they use for this piece. Makes me miss how text was rendered in 2006 on Windows XP machines with low res monitors, when applying anti aliasing to text was rarer.

    Looks like they link to the relevant site in the bottom.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    Wow, this person kinda sucks?

    Failure to build is abhorrent to me. Much of the anger on the planet right now is from humans who aren’t building, believing they are owed a free lunch because they showed up, or they know better, or some other poorly informed worldview they acquired without effort, without curiosity… just because they exist in their particular circumstances. Writing is how I build. That’s why I write.

    You will never do 150% of a thing if you do not have a version of these motivations. 15% effort means you have not found your reasons yet.

    The LinkedIn level cringe and that they admit they spend all their time talking to AI is... making them pretty hard to take seriously.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago*

    Just looking at the happy human/sorry robot image, it doesn't work as well if the image is large (at least for me), the outline of the decoy message starts to take visual priority over the real message especially if you don't know what it is. With no additional context, I definitely read sorry robot on first glance with the image at phone's width and didn't realise that's not the actual message until I read the description. Seems to work when the letters are smaller though.

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 3 months ago

    It might be useful in some countries where the prevalent unencrypted messaging app is preventively scanning every single image before actually delivering it to the recipient, and silently dropping it if some forbidden keywords are found

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 9 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    Wait, do people think robots use OCR to spy on them? They have access to the actual unicode symbols. They know that an A is an A regardless if it's displayed as Arial, Times New Roman or Wing Dings. Is there a subculture somewhere that people only communicate through text as images?

  • source
  • view more: next β€Ί