home - all - feeds - topics | FightForPrivacy - memes - sumo - games - technology - news - lemmyshitpost - fuck_ai - ClassicFilms - comicstrips - autism - Revenge - pravda_news - onehundredninetysix - shittyasklemmy - witchymemes - france - world - flashlight - newcommunities - more »
log in or sign up | preferences |
quokk.au site icon
tattoos@sh.itjust.works posts comments
  • new
  • hot
  • top
  • old
  • tattoos

    tattoos@sh.itjust.works
    147 readers
    8 active
    0 users here now

    A place for sharing ink.

    founded 3 years ago
    moderation log
    moderators
    carbonatedfartjuice@sh.itjust.works

    comments

    comment on Light-responsive inks could make tattoos visible on demand, but safety remains unproven in c/tattoos@sh.itjust.works
    [–] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 1 point 4 weeks ago

    Not sure why you think the Nazis would care about the courtesy of making it invisible.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • comment on Light-responsive inks could make tattoos visible on demand, but safety remains unproven in c/tattoos@sh.itjust.works
    [–] late_night@sopuli.xyz 1 point 4 weeks ago

    UV inks have been around for a while, they don't last very long sadly.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • comment on Light-responsive inks could make tattoos visible on demand, but safety remains unproven in c/tattoos@sh.itjust.works
    [–] wyldrstallyns@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 4 weeks ago

    I was implying they'd use it for themselves, to tell who was one of their kind. But, yeah, sure. That too. 😅

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • comment on Light-responsive inks could make tattoos visible on demand, but safety remains unproven in c/tattoos@sh.itjust.works
    [–] yakko@feddit.uk 3 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

    Yeah because that's what the Nazis need, the ability to put invisible QR codes on our fuckin foreheads with ink that probably cause cancer

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • comment on Light-responsive inks could make tattoos visible on demand, but safety remains unproven in c/tattoos@sh.itjust.works
    [–] wyldrstallyns@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 4 weeks ago* (3 children)

    Sorry, but sweeps arm at timeline this is not gonna go well at all —not even if they try to spin as an "alt" lifestyle invention... and not the us v Them escalation it'll spark. 🥲

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • comment on Light-responsive inks could make tattoos visible on demand, but safety remains unproven in c/tattoos@sh.itjust.works
    [–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 8 points 4 weeks ago

    I can already make a tattoo that is visible on demand that runs no more risks than a standard tat: Putting it somewhere that's normally covered by clothing.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • comment on Moon crest (by Kiera at The Manchester Social) in c/tattoos@sh.itjust.works
    [–] Nanook@lemmy.zip 2 points 10 months ago

    That’s not how crescent moons work. That’s a C.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • comment on Awesome tattoo by Reçel & Pekmez in c/tattoos@sh.itjust.works
    [–] DampCanary@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

    For a moment I thought it's nyanko-sensei

    Tap for spoilermadara

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • piefed
    0.5.3
    mlmym
    dotzip.1.9
    quokk.au
    modlog