[–] 1 point 10 months ago (1 child)

Burn-in is still a problem, though. For actual television - not an issue, unless you leave CNN on all day every day. (What, do you live in an airport?) For a computer display... yeah, that's gonna show up.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    I have an Alienware OLED (AW3423DW). I've been using it for almost a year now. I use it for ~13h a day, for work, gaming and media (YT, TV shows, movies). I have HDR enabled in Windows and I use the monitor in HDR1000 mode.

    I left the taskbar on for a few months and it got burnt in. I also got burn-in from watching content that is in 16:9 ratio (the monitor is 21:9). The monitor also got a defect, in the form of a thick line that is brighter that anything else that runs across half the top of the monitor left to right.

    Despite this experience I would still buy OLED because IMO the brightness and colors are worth it but I also warn everyone that they WILL get burn-in if they want to use it to its full potential and all day long.

    OLEDs are not there yet. Maybe in a few years or decades we'll get actual burn-in proof OLEDs

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    worst possible scenario effectively trying to burn in the screen

    calibrated to 200 nits brightness

    Wut?
    At that there shouldn't be any sort of burn-ins ever.
    (That monitor can do '250 nits full screen, 1,000 nits max HDR')

    (Also just 8 hours per day, dark taskbar (the only static thing in his case), monitor goes to slep after 2 hours of inactivity.)

    This doesn't help my use-case at all :(.
    It's not a stress test by any measure, the only "extreme" thing he is doing to it is "not allowing it to go to sleep after a few minutes of inactivity".

  • source