[–] 2 points 3 months ago (4 children)

@Feyd I think they're fighting to stay relevant, and that means focus on AI. The market share of people that do not want it in the IDE must be minuscule, if the entire team jumped the gun. I agree they used to be the reliable choice, the IDE that just works, and works best. It seems this image is being sidelined in favor of keeping up with what the majority needs from them in order not to switch to Cursor. @slesa

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago

    @kibblebitsIntellij for almost anything, python, go, javascript, groovy, xquery (marklogic) and sometimes even java. Also many piles of yaml for automation.It takes some effort to get it working, especially xquery, but for me there is no competition.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago

    @kibblebits it’s such a primitive IDE and lacks so much that we take for granted nowadays. It makes running on devices easy and handles the overly complex certificate handling easier, but that’s it. The debugger is atrocious, no refactoring, bad code editing, no sane tabs, slow…

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] -1 points 5 months ago

    RustRover. AI is turned off. Love it. Though I'm somewhat OK with NeoVIM keystrokes, I fear it will take a lot of time to get to the level of comfort in debugging, auto complete, run configurations, import management, linting etc. I have with RustRover.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (14 children)

    Is anyone here NOT using Java also running Jetbrains IDEs? Which and for what?

    Edit: JET

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago

    I dropped my subscribtion the moment the AI bullshit started, and keep using my perpetual/fallback license for the version before that.

    Once you pay for a year, you can keep using that years version indefinitely, save money and as a bonus you don't get more AI shit stuffed in your throat.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago

    Yes, but only the diff.

    What if my change is one parameter in a function call ? The most meaningful aspect of the change lies in the definition of said function, that may not be part of the diff.

    What if my change is related to another commit that I want to reference in my message ? I'd have to close the dialog, copy the commit ID, and reopen the dialog.

    For an infinite amount of reasons we rarely foresee, blocking states are never good.

    If I wanted VSCode, I'd use VSCode and their shitty design.

    Same.

    But this one thing isn't part of said shitty design.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • view more: ‹ prev next ›