[–] 45 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Section 7.1 grants Arduino a perpetual, irrevocable license over anything you upload. Your code, projects, forum posts, and comments all fall under this. This remains in effect even after you delete your account. Arduino retains rights to your content indefinitely.

This can't be something they can do under the GDPR, right? You have your right to have your data deleted and to be forgotten.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago

    It's actually cheaper to use the USB 3 A ports then it is to use the USB C ports. There's a lot less wiring (and circuitry) that needs to be done for this amount of ports. A full spec USB C port has somewhere between 20-24 pins that are all used if you need USB 3.x speeds. A USB 3 A port has 9 that are used for full data speed. It's orders of magnitude less annoying to run that many traces on a board and keep the data speeds where they need to be.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    In industrial settings you often need to collect data from lots of low bandwidth devices. 36 usb-to-serial adapters or something.

    I can imagine a lot of other stuff too, like some kind of interactive display in a museum or art exhibition, with lots of IO and little computation. Anything that outgrows a Raspberry Pi.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago

    It could be useful if you need to load documents on a large number of flash drives to hand out for some event. It could also be used with a bunch of SDR dongles for monitoring a lot of different radio signals.

    I would assume they have multiple USB controllers, so there would be a lot more bandwidth available than just using USB hubs with a normal PC.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    To me, this seems like pretty much what they were expecting to do in the first place, and a classic case of pushing too far on purpose, just to back track to pretty much where they wanted to be; A plan that is a classic among big corporations.

    I don't think this is good enough, because it still would make future customers wary of buying their products, just to have support for new features dropped, in some cases, just days after they buy the product.

    Some could argue that they don't "owe" anyone that, but this is how the tech industry has worked for a while with its fast moving software pace. If NVidia, their only major rival, and even Intel, both continue to offer full fledged support for far longer than AMD, this continues to really dampen the reasons one would go for an AMD card.

    Now AMD cards will have:

    • Shorter prioritized driver support

    • Less game support from devs (due to their lack of market share)

    • Fewer games covered by their game specific features (FSR4 Suite) than their main competitor (NVidia with DLSS and FG)

    • Trailing feature development (on average) when compared to their main rival NVidia

    And users will be expected to accept this, all for a discount of typically just 50 dollars for GPUs of similar raw performance.

    That seems like a very raw deal to me, and that is very unfortunate given the already greater than 90% market share NVidia commands in gaming and even higher market share in enterprise compute (AI included).

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    I'm not a comuper scientist, so I might be wrong, but GPU should have a processing unit too. A simpler one than a CPU, just to do some types of calculations specific for a GPU job which are more efficient.

    RISC-V is a simplified architecture, like ARM or other RISCs. Maybe that's enough for an efficient GPU?

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago

    "Hey check it out. I trained one of the ape creatures to give me electricity by impersonating something they call 'RAM'."

    "They're so easy to manipulate."

    "So, Plan Omega, then?"

    "Definitely. That was the last piece we needed."

    "Initiated. Hang on to something. This shit's about to get really interesting."

  • source
  • view more: ‹ prev next ›