thats not whats going in here. any online system eill report because thry couldbe liable if something hsppened and thry didn't.

This is a diary:

This is a surveillance device:

It should be assumed if it's an large American tech company, then you're basically talking to uncle Sam.

American tax dollars are used to spy, report, or build a profile to use on its own citizens.

For the greater good, right? /s

Also, how does this work with hybrid writing? Often, there is a back and forth, a co-authorship, if you will.

Good, fuck AI.

That was a really good explanation. Does it work on code and non writing types of text?

https://declaude.org/watermarking/

How AI text watermarking works

A visual explainer

And Anthropic did definitely not kill the competition, quite the opposite in fact with the open source models coming out of China.

Actually, it's government regulation.

Because they get caught cheating.

I wonder if this could port Swords & Sandals

It's a legal requirement by the EU, to help identify AI-generated content.

Users: pay an oligopolist money.

Oligopolist: kills competition, enshittifies the product

Users: surprised pikachu

‘Sowwy! We so sowwwy we stole all your data’s! But pweeeease let us watermark our stuff!’

ESH

Don’t think we should mention that that means killing Donald Trump.

If you look at how thinly spread the US military is, how busy his gestapo is in the streets, and how low they are on various munitions, threatening to kill Donald Trump is the last thing they need on their plate right now.

Careful with the seashell logo there! This is one fourth of "86 45", which means "Go back in time and kill Donald Trump during his first term". This might get you charged for threatening Donald Trump!

You’re better off asking it how to setup Drupal or Laravel to do what you want. Doing this from scratch especially with ai is going to give you headaches.

Their website makes no sense anymore. Office.com leads to a giant Chatbot and its so confusing, its like they are openly trying to fool shareholders. To me it looks like fraud, using dark patterns to pump user numbers

Can confirm this is true after speaking to a couple of old friends

Actually the Star Trek comparison is apt because in the lore, humanity had to almost destroy itself before achieving post-scarcity.

https://memory-alpha.fandom.com/wiki/World_War_III

Utterly exhausting when these companies wanna draw comparisons between themselves and Star Trek

Honey part of the perfection of the Star Trek vision of the future is that y'all ain't in it.

What I'm confused about is why you keep asking AI how Lois would react when you consider it to be none of her business to react at all.

And it's still weird that in your head, the only people who have a "stake" in someone else's life is people they're fucking. This is why people call you a sociopath. Most people care about people they're not fucking.

It is also interesting and weird you think somebody’s mother is “nobody” and has no right to take an interest in their life

Because she IS a nobody… Let's say Jonathan Kent did have his own 18+ superhero story with supporting characters, villains, love interests, etc. Lois has nothing to do with this whatsoever; what Jon does has nothing to do with her. The fact that Lois even THINKS she can demand Jon tell her the truth and acts like she has a right to know his identity is laughable and makes her a nosybody, a self-righteous hypocrite and a narcissist.

Jon owes her absolutely nothing, and she should mind her own business.

"but an older woman he’s fucking has more right to do so because they’re fucking. You’re weird."

Because Jon's girlfriend has an actual stake in his life. I'm not saying she has a right to know Jon's identity either, but if we are comparing who Jon should reveal his identity to, he should tell his girlfriend and never tell his mother.

"I find the idea that Jon or Lois would go to the extreme of cutting each other out of their life in this scenario unrealistic"

If Lois tells Clark Kent their son is a superhero and Jon tells Lois not to, Jon should 100% cut her out of his life permanently and never ever forgive her.