[–] 5 points 4 months ago (1 child)

this is... what the hell is this nonsense.

1 small sentence by a human at the top.

the rest is utter nonsense garbage clearly copy/pasted.

then you copy and paste it someone else online.... is this seriously what humans have devolved into? utterly useless beings?

I want off this ride... this is pathetically sad

  • source
  • [–] [S] 1 point 4 months ago (1 child)

    Some people opt in to letting their chats be used to train future models. When I downloaded the app, I was asked this. It also could be referring to prompts used in training as opposed to those that are privately owned by consumers. Like it has to have access to chats used in its testing phases for each model. So maybe that is where it comes from. Either way, hallucination or not, these are interesting ideas I want to build on. But great point. I overlooked that reality.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 15 points 4 months ago* (2 children)

    If chat gpt has access to other people's chat history, there is a big problem.

    It just made this up, it's what AI does a lot of the time.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago

    Chatgpt generates markdown output by default, which supports titles, bold text ... Etc but doesn't support colored text. I would try to ask to generate html. It would not be supported by its client, you would have to open the file in a browser.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 8 months ago

    You might want to look at using codex or opencode with ChatGPT.

    It’s not immediately clear if you’re just trying to get a better user experience for yourself or you’re trying to get the llm to output it with some style.

    What prompt(s) are you giving it?

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 9 months ago

    This very much depends on usage. A big thing is training as its a big unknown. sans training each prompt that is not generative uses like the energy of 3 to five web searches. Given you likely have to do a few searches to get the info, if it gives you a good one, from a prompt it actually seems close to even. I can't really say on generation as I have not really been able to compare its output to what it would take for someone to do it manually. Steaming video uses a fairly good amount of power. So if someone is playing with chat gpt to entertain themselves instead of streaming even low rez video it looks like its actually less energy. This does leave training as a big question mark but then again what about all the behind the scenes a search engine does to prepare for searching. things like scraping and running things through its algorithms. I have also seen some pretty decent steps by the various companies to save energy and they definately are motivated to (since as far as I know it still runs at a loss). So Im not as concerned about its power use as much as I once was and hope that hardware and software will keep on evolving and I think its possible it could in general take less energy than an alternative. Now that does not speak at all to the limitations of its output.

  • source
  • view more: next ›