Well the problem is, only a ghoul would refuse to treat someone based on political affiliation
comments
With our history..... IDK who to believe.
allegedly
Can't they just say he "said" it instead of saying he "suggested" it. Like he literally said the words, why soften it? It's so annoying.
comment on
‘Psyop’: How Far-Right Conspiracy Theories About the Minnesota Shooting Evolved to Protect MAGA
By the books, as usual. Something something "he yelled antifah when he pulled the trigger" anyway moving on to something else
Would be a shame if doctors violating their oath had something bad happen to them .
If it's based off "political affiliation," couldn't some doctors refuse to treat trump supporters if they were sneaky about it?
That's the intent
Hippocratic oath or hipocritical oath am I right
doctors could refuse to treat veterans based on their "reason for seeking care - including allegations of rape and sexual assault - current or past political party affiliation or political activity, and personal behavior such as alcohol or marijuana use".
An incredibly high number of veterans (or anyone, really) with PTSD have or had substance use disorder. A large percentage of those same veterans have MST (military sexual trauma). Quite a lot of people are discharged from the military following disclosure of being a victim of rape or sexual assault while serving. This is going to lead to more veterans killing themselves because they aren't getting the care they deserve
This is just completely incorrect. Claw back in no way suggests an underdog.
That's not at all what that means.
Claw back implies money (or something else) has already been sent out and is trying to once again be retrieved from the receiving party.
Maybe guillotines
Informed Americans are a threat to American conservatives and/or Republicans: it's best to keep them stupid.
Whoever wrote the title was just trying to insinuate something extra vicious and violent in nature. It's a common part of our fair and unbiased media.
To be clear, they're cutting an extra $9.4 Billion in services. Maybe it's used differently in British English but in the US "claw back" as an idiom generally refers to a win for an underdog party to keep something after a difficult fight, not a privileged party ending access to something.
Don’t forget the big double dip into our pockets and data and history by big tech so Elon and Mark and Don can go on the two-seater sperm ark to Mars.