glad you found it helpful friend, yes those people that spoke out should have been rewarded!

shreds

And, unfortunately, Whatsapp.

WTAF.

Grateful for the second link, it explains the staff were shown content to review and sort as part of their job and they spoke out about the privacy issues, rather than them seeking out nudes for fun.

the wealthy rape children. every single one of them. there are no exceptions.

Including INSTAGRAM. So many people still using Instagram.

This is about muddying the water.

Allowing fakes like this to circulate helps support doubt about evidence and credible accusations against abusers. In the post Epstein era the diddler class has adapted to flooding the internet with bullshit rather than just trying to cover everything up.

Misuse/abuse of AI tools helps them sow doubt and mistrust. The ready availability and general subsidy of AI forgeries is hugely beneficial to authoritarianism in general.

If you continue to use and support Meta products, you directly support this.

and then he fired them: https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c5y7yvgy0w6o

Haha I think they just try to not get sued by his self pleasuring corp ;) He even made people in Kenya watch it so he isn't the only one: https://techcrunch.com/2026/03/05/meta-sued-over-ai-smartglasses-privacy-concerns-after-workers-reviewed-nudity-sex-and-other-footage/

May? Zuckerberg will be creaming himself over the content hoovered up from the physical offline world.

ironicly slop

Don’t dismiss it so easily. Yes they existed but a good percentage didn’t vote. The Russian disinformation campaigns marshalled and weaponised them.

We all remember Cambridge Analytica scandal, this ain't no "glitch", it's purely intentional.

Nah. The data centers just amplify what was already there. About a third of society is a bigoted, uneducated, narcissistic mess that only looks out for themselves.

Is that guy just, like, really big?

Also more people have been rallying against the government whenever and wherever there is one since "they took back the power which is different from winning the elections", according to the current vice-president.

But how many more? (Tl in alt text)

Amusing how the only news I've come across the Brazilian presidential election in the threadiverse, twice from different sources, is from the accusation against Meta. Meanwhile, corruption scandals against the current government keep pilling up.

I'm acting on behalf of Facebook, give me all your blood

If you know any Brazilians and you get the chance, do point that to them. Both are extremely popular business tools in the country.

They “trust” me.

Dumb fucks.

The problem with the light is, it's incredibly small and dim, so is very easy to miss. Plus, people aren't aware of what to look for yet because they're not used to being around this "perv-vision".

I saw a guy at a sandwich shop with them and he was loud and bragging about them which was the only reason I knew he had them.

I'm honestly shocked they're allowed in Illinois being there's the "all party consent" law still in effect where any audio surveillance or recording needs to make all parties aware they're being recorded. Then add in the BIPA (biometric information privacy act) where you KNOW Meta is going to use face ID or facial recognition to tag or show the owner who's who.

US https://www.change.org/p/ban-meta-glasses-ray-ban-from-public-and-private-use

UK https://www.change.org/p/ban-meta-ai-glasses

In a bizarre case of digital censorship, Meta’s content moderation system stepped in to stop a local theatre in Barcelona from promoting a stage adaptation on the grounds that it violated a rule on promoting “social topics,” per the Guardian.

So the social media giant doesn't want people talking about social topics? So why should they exist?

Nope.

The camera-free glasses, code-named Luna, will still feature an array of six microphones to allow users to speak to the company’s AI chatbot and its recently-released AI assistant, called Muse. They’ll presumably pick up audio from users’ environments as well, where bystanders may not be aware of the eavesdropping.