I don't have to get past the preface to read things like:
" I should also give some space to Amotz Zahavi’s idea that altruistic donation might be a ‘Potlatch’ style of dominance signal: see how superior to you I am, I can afford to make a donation to you!"
But don't worry, I'll read the entire book and highlight what I think is most despicable. Is it just a Lemmy post? Yes, but this matter is important to me.
I'll think of it as if I were writing a scientific article of low reach.
Edit: Further down the PREFACE:
"Similar feeble thoughts have been strung together to produce the impression that Darwinian social theory is reactionary in its political implications. "
. He calls his theory a Darwinian social theory! This is a joke!
Moving on.