I had been using Kate for working on C++, Objective-C, and python projects both on macOS and Linux. I didn't manage to get C++ debugging or the LSP integrations working, as it isn't easy to figure out how to setup it up on different platforms.
In the last 6 months, I have switched over to Gram, and it is trivial to configure the LSPs and debuggers, and have since stopped using Kate.
No I wasn’t suggested it be forced or companies be nationalized.
I was saying governments could provide incentives and support for workers to form worker owned companies. At the moment western governments heavily favor formation of capitalist companies.
I think the boom and bust cycle of tech is result of capitalists trying to make big bets and then mostly failing.
With worker owned companies, you wouldn’t have this type of risky investing. Workers would optimization not for massive returns, but sustainable business practices, products, working conditions. A worker owned company wouldn’t burn cash for 10 years, artificially keeping prices low to starve out competition.
In order to transition to worker owned companies, it would be difficult as you mention, but governments could provide financial to help to get worker owned companies started.
Worker owned companies are the way forward.
You should try Gram instead. It is a Zed fork with all the AI and other anti-features removed.
I stopped reading after they mentioned the battery performance was only measured on Windows. This is ridiculous to not measure it on Linux.
I did similar, Xbox 360->PS4->Steam Deck
The main argument is due to copyright issues of LLM generated code. Github will happily remove repos which violated copyright laws or IP laws. It makes sense that Codeberg doesn’t want to host code which may be violating copyright law.
The American capitalist tech industry is already a dystopian hellscape 😂
This sadly aligns with my company. Remote workers remaining from before the forced return to office can’t get a promotion unless they move to a city with an official office. This is actually the stated company policy, not an unspoken policy.
None of that questions if we should be building AI in the first place.
Who stands to benefit when AI is developed and has massive consequences on society? I think it is mainly capitalists and global elite benefiting and society losing out.
Also no mention of the environmental destruction that is needed to build and run AI.
I’m skeptical when AI leaders and big tech are behind it. They want to be part of the discussion to make sure their AI business remains protected and becomes cemented as one of the few solutions allowed to operate.