[–] 32 points 4 months ago* (2 children)

Not better; different. They behave the way the people doing the watching want them to behave. Whether that's better is purely situational, and that (among others) is why global surveillance is a bad idea.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago (4 children)

    Not a dig at you or the script author, but I'm kinda miffed we're relegated to running some rando github user's bash scripts to check if we're affected. This is the direct opposite response one should have to this kind of attack. I feel the AUR maintainers should have been more forthcoming about what they are doing to stop the attack and how users can mitigate the consequences if affected.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • view more: ‹ prev next ›