[–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

The most amateur looking model is Flux.Krea. It's censored, though, in comparison with Chroma. Chroma Flash Heun is supposed to run with 10 steps Heun sampler. Try that. I've tried it and it's slightly different from Perchance. There's a model patch and loras from Perchance, I'm pretty sure, so you're unlikely to 100% replicate it.

  • source
  •  

    Could anyone point me in the right direction, what model exactly is used on Perchance? I've tried every Chroma Unlocked from version 30 to 50, including HD and Flash and none of them look about the same as Perchance. What other moduls are used to improve visual quality? I've tried all kind of ModelSampling settings giving the model freedom, as well as detailers. What else is there?

    [–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    The sequence of your prompt tokens does matter. If you really want something, it should go first. As a rule of thumb, you could split the prompt into three parts, as proposed in the perchance t2i beginner guide. Description (who), Composition (where, doing what), Style. In your example, you prioritize the style, followed by an "empty" token of the woman's name, followed by the okay description. So, I'd suggest you use chat gpt or a similar LLM, ask it to "create a detailed descriptive prompt, using natural language, in the format (description>composition>style) for a Chroma Unlocked text to image generator of a ...". You'll get much better results. As a side note, chroma unlocked as well as most flux models are trained on a large dataset, so the results are greatly diverse. You can only achieve character consistency locally on your machine using comfyUI or similar tools.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    It's not the model, I think. I tried it on my comfyUI, chroma v48, it barely ever gives me extra limbs. It could be the resolution. The model was trained in 1024x1024 format, and the options offered on perchance don't match. But to compensate for that perchance offers great image quality, the workflow (or loras) or whatever sampler/scheduler combinations... I've tried it all with the latest chroma and couldn't replicate it. It's amazing here on perchance.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child)

    The AI's have come a long way, especially the recent versions that catch a lot of details, but they are just not there yet for the task you're describing working on the prompt alone. If you really want a detailed scene of three or more people you will need to dive into the world of LoRas, Control Net and other tools, in ComfyUI or similar program. Another approach would be to make a very detailed image of each of the three characters here on perchance, and then, ask Flux.1 Kontext to put them all in one scene doing something you want without changing their appearance. I've had very good results with this approach, and it's much easier, too.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    I'd also like to know. One thing is for sure, the base is flux.1-schnell with LoRas. Except, it still accepts negative prompts to some degrees (weakly), which flux shouldn't do.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    Nunchuks also has negative prompt, but Chroma seems to deal with fat ugly lip contouring a lot better it seems. My first impression.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    The best ones are installed locally. If you have ComfyUI or similar interface, you can install ForgeFlux Kontext. Which is the best and the latest model in the field of image-to-image, imho.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    Same prompts lead to the same results, give or take. The OP said FACES and EVERY TIME in caps, suggesting he's getting the same faces everytime he's using the i2t which is not true. I was just trying to point out that there are ways to describe many details and change that.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child)

    Sure, camera brings even an anime image to life. Just a front picture everytime is boring. Try describing how a camera is looking at the characters or the scene and you'll notice the difference in the dynamics. A simple example, This picture tells a story rather than showing an anime character. And it's only 3 short sentence about the camera work, angle, focus.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  •  

    https://perchance.org/mytestgen#edit In this generator, I have a suit list that consists of 5 areas: mask, cape, boots etc. The other two lists are "camera" and "actor". So, camera can zoom-in on a certain body part, and I need it to output only that section of clothing, leaving everything else out-of-frame. That I solved. But there's a third dimension to it. The third list is Actor, some characters cannot wear certain clothes because of their characteristics, for example, mermaid can't wear bottom clothes. Help me add that third dimension into the output line to filter it out properly, please.

    Text-to-image logic (lemmy.world)
     

    Recently, text-to-image plugin has changed a lot. With respect to Perchance, I'd like to share my humble opinion about it. Take a horse in a medieval setting, for example, 2 pictures out of 5 have blurred/distorted faces. It's not a famous face or a nudity content but it's still getting heavily censored for some reason. I understand the need for censorship and such, but could we focus more on the end user not seeing what they don't want to see in the gallery section rather than messing with the t2i logic? It's a fake parts in fake parts out, at the end of the day, no real person is involved, but it's messing with normal images generation kinda defeating the whole purpose of the plugin and hindering the imagination flow.

     

    https://perchance.org/tz4t341n8c#edit In this test generator, in the center, I have a select form which is just a pose list put into options. I have a lot of them in my main generator, and I want to make them a little be more user friendly and interactive, also bypassing language barrier, so I want to add pictures into the options instead( or in addition to words). That's what I did in the poseRadio list. I substituted radio label's background with pictures using CSS styles. I'm planning to have a second list of picture urls for each list, or I could create an array of URLs in the html part. Ideally, it should look like a dropdown with a picture and then the list item name next to it. And when selected, only the item name is stored in the variable without the picture. I'm not sure how to do that yet. Need your help combining select and input radio in some way, thanks!

     

    Hi. I'm using a line like this [fileName="{0-9}{a-z}{A-Z}".selectMany(12).join("")] to create a set of numbers and letters at the beginning of the prompt. In the previous model I used to set the priority to 0, so the AI ignored it, but I noticed that the new model ignores :: and these numbers started to appear on objects inside the images. Could I assign a filename in any other way?

     

    Hi, I'm looking for a way for the AI to understand a hex color in the format #fff000, for example, if I get it from a color html element. If you directly ask the flux plugin to show a #fff000 shirt he will use a random color instead, so ideally I need to translate it into words, if that's possible at all? Or perhaps, there's another way.

     

    I have a list of clothing items and a variable [gender] that contains value for example "♂️" male. Some items on the list of clothing also contain emojis ♀️ or ♂️ in them, something like "Batman suit♂️". I'm trying to exclude all items with ♀️ if "gender==♂️" and vice versa. I've tried to use clothingTop.selectAll.filter(newlist =>newlist.tags.includes([gender])), ald also match(/♀️/i), I'm not sure how to proceed.

     

    Hi, since the new model came out I struggle to create a middle-of-the-day atmosphere for my photos. "sunny", "very sunny", "the sun is in the zenith", "middle-of-the-day sunny lighting", "{bright|soft} natural day lighting" and many more produce early morning or late day close to sunset. I also tried to use Joy Caption to describe the photos from before, but the description of the lighting and the atmosphere is quite vague and it doesn't help to solve the problem. Any help, please?

    view more: next ›