[โ€“] -1 points 2 weeks ago* (1 child)

Might have helped the introduction if you said what you are talking about...

Here are the top 5

The top 5 what?

Looks like it should just work, right? On stable it doesn't, and it trips twice.

"Trips" does it Claude? ๐Ÿคจ

  • source
  • [โ€“] 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 child)

    Pairwise ranking is definitely better than stars, but nobody wants to read your slop, sorry.

    Google shows there are lots of these already: Flickchart, Canonova (slop), moup.app (also slop), popcornlist (possibly slop but they at least wrote their own prose so they get a pass, though it is an iPhone app only), pairckle (generic pairwise ranking, not slop!)

    Also it doesn't sound like you have figured out how to actually do the ranking yet. Look up Bradley-Terry or TrueSkill.

    As usually, the difficult bit is getting users.

  • source
  • [โ€“] 0 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)

    Python may be a grown up language but it's still a pretty awful language for ad-hoc scripting. It really wants to believe that you only use it for writing Python projects damnit! You can beat it into submission, but as soon as you start typing import in a situation that isn't a nice pure Python package it will say "whatchulookinatmate? Youwannafight?"

    Don't believe me? Explain how relative imports work.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [โ€“] -2 points 2 weeks ago (1 child)

    Assuming that's a genuine question...

    AI needs feedback just the same as humans. I would think of AI like a human that's of average cleverness, but has a huge breadth of knowledge and basically infinite time and patience. They are going to be decent at assembly but they're still going to make mistakes just like humans.

    Using a language like Rust that has a lot of static correctness checks gives a higher quality result for AI, just like it does for humans.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [โ€“] 1 point 2 weeks ago (3 children)

    None of those have been successful for various reasons (I think primarily because they all sound like they'd be a total nightmare to set up and maintain).

    As soon as uv provides an alternative implementation so you can just run uv run --but-fast I think it will become popular.

    I would not be at all surprised if they are secretly working on a faster Python implementation. They own all of the non-shit Python tooling, they have unlimited tokens now, they aren't afraid of vibe coding. Why not?

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • view more: โ€น prev next โ€บ