Looks like you developed animosity towards me.
Perchance Dev, this is not true, right?
It is true that an LLM could not create this without your guidance. But you still did vibe code it using an LLM, is that not right?
Hm, okay. I will concede, you got me here.
No more ugly AI-slop interfaces.
But you made it using an LLM, and it also looks like an AI-slop interface, no? Also, this is not the place to advertize your gens.
That site you linked doesn't track whether the AI is working or not. It simply checks whether https://perchance.org/ responds or not. If Perchance were to be down, that gen wouldn't even load; that gen is misleading.
This is not a place of promotion. Take it elsewhere.
So, I decided to to look into Perchance's internal code myself, since I couldn't get an answer.

And it looks like Both the __generatorLastEditTime parameter and the __initWithDataFromParentWindow parameter are needed ONLY during the initial load.
And looking at this part of the code, it seems like Perchance dev is already moving away from the __generatorLastEditTime parameter.
// if(window.location.href.includes("__generatorLastEditTime=")) return;
So, I am assuming it is fine to remove these two parameters after the app has loaded. However, I could be wrong, these are just my general understanding after looking into the internal logic.
The exact type of bug is undisclosed.
Also they could be inactive, could be busy, could be working. You never know.
When the bug is fixed. 👍
Pinging @Perchance Dev and @VioneT.
I once forked Blank as Blank Private, if this suggestion isn't implemented, Blank Private could stop the annoyance of having to set the generator to private.

