2
The Coming Loop - Modern Task Management (lucumr.pocoo.org)
submitted 4 months ago by to c/discuss@discuss.online
7 comments fedilink hide all child comments

all 7 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 2 points 4 months ago (3 children)

You might get more engagement if the post title indicated what the topic was, and it's inside the post. It gave more details if it was worth reading

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] [S] 2 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    Good idea, though not sure what a good subtitle is in this case. If I add "AI" to the title, it will probably receive drive-by downvotes, which is a hard problem to solve with Lemmy as it is today. I'd rather have a little bit of signal coming from a place of curiosity than lots of noise.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago* (1 child)

    title - Modern Task Management

    signal / noise this was also picked up on hackernews - maybe some of the discussion gets split.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] [S] 2 points 4 months ago

    Thanks, updated. Not precisely sure what you meant with your latter statement, but just to clarify what I said above, I mean that I'd rather have a little bit of good signal in the conversation here in this community, than lots of noisy comments from the Threadiverse at large.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
    • [–] 2 points 4 months ago* (2 children)

    For now I have not moved past the point of comprehension being important to me.

    Embracing the shift to product manager

    I think this document is revisiting the formalization of business processes and acceptance criteria from the '70s, but within the context of generated content and code. If you've ever worked with an offshoring organization, it's pretty much the same thing. Except you're not expecting a human to be in the middle

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] [S] 2 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    Interesting comparison, it really does seem like that. Lot of similarities in writing/generating code that technically "works" but is brittle, overengineered, etc.

    I think there's no replacement for giving a shit. I saw an interesting link about using AI to write better code more slowly, but that still requires that you care.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •