I'm not a historian, but I wouldn't be surprised if marriage existed before governments
post
Modern marriage isn't much more than a financial arrangement. Not tryna say people don’t get married for love, but the fact remains that as an institution, marriage isn’t about love and never has been.
Literally just got married this weekend. It was for love. Because now, it's in the public records that I love this woman, and she loves me.
It was cheaper (for us) than taking a press release.
This probably depends on the country, but being married can make some official processes simpler. For example, if a married person dies there are certain things that just default to their official spouse unless otherwise specified in a legal will.
This kinda makes your point about it being a financial arrangement, with a bit of a legal one in there too I guess.
I also think it sometimes makes things easier where kids are involved during official processes.
Yes, lets all blame the one guy you’re thinking of that subjected the entire prehistoric population of earth to their concept of marriage. You’re a genius.
Marriage as a legal status originated in religion. Governments are merely adapting what the church has been enforcing for centuries.
It began as a way to "secure" having your own babies. "I take care of all your needs and in exchange you only fuck with me so all your children are mine". That's why cheating wasn't seen as a problem for men but it was for married women.
As male cheating became seen as problematic, though, marriage topics suddenly became pushed more by women rather than men.
https://youtu.be/vXpsT3e8UsM?is=f4szbr9-H82I0gYM
Government should have no place in your love life
It's how they urbanised, not why. The why is agriculture. And it wasn't religion the way we see it today.
No, i would say it's very similar. Pilgrimages, a priest class, specific buildings to worship in and "sunday school" of some form or another. If you disapprove of modern religions but like the old ones then it's really the content of the religion you have irks with.
Early "shrines" in Mesopotamia were about making a landmark to find and return to and rebuild each time they came by (which isn't necessarily a "pilgrimage", just knowing where to return), and then building large storage rooms for all the grain that could be redistributed to the people. We don't have any particular trace related to sacrifice or teaching worship, or even any mark of distinction between priest and non-priest class, as this was before writing. Source is "the invention of the city" by Gwendolyn Leick.
It was religion. Religion wanted to control sex. Think of the power this gives them. When you can have sex, with who you can have sex, how you have sex... They decided they wanted to control your life through sex (and social life too).
This is the reason why they were/are all so anti gay. Get people having sex all the time, they can't have that! Also abortion. People having sex out of wedlock and not getting "punished" with an unwanted child? Sooo scary for them. Masturbation and pornography also, same thing. They want to get all up in your business. They want to control sex and it's the power that gives them.
Marriage is the church's way of giving you permission to have sex.
all 31 comments