Daily reminder that when you remove the labels of who is doing the actions and their alignment with existing powers (the state, dissidents, etc.), the word terrorism has no coherent definition.
post
17 comments in c/legalnews@lemmy.zip view that post
What the fuck.
replies:
Terrorism: "the unlawful use of violence and intimidation, especially against civilians, in the pursuit of political aims:"
Make it make sense because I'm not seeing how this is terrorism.
replies:
If peaceful protest is going to carry the same sentence as violent terrorism, what's the point of trying to be peaceful?
That slope sure is slippery
replies:
We know which side of the class war that guy is on.
replies:
Scandalous
This is how effective zionist lobbies are. They probably gut that judge by the walls. He is the one who should be charged with terrorism as decisions like these strike fear into people who would like to join peaceful protests.
Add another nail to the so called pretentious "western values" coffin.
Slip slip slip down the slppe
1 comment in c/unitedkingdom@feddit.uk view that post
Daily reminder that the Middle East Eye refuses to disclose it’s owner, which is extremely suspicious. That’s because the Middle East Eye is directly run by Qatar’s embassy in London.
Next time, please at least quote The Guardian or another British media outlet.
1 comment in c/europe@lemmy.dbzer0.com view that post
[removed by mod]
replies:
1 comment